• Skip to main content

    Distribution

    New Section 232 tariff: Leverage to pay for power

    Written by Greg Wittbecker


    The newly announced amendments to Section 232 boost the ad valorem duty (a volume-based tariff) from 10 to 25% of the declared customs value for primary aluminum.

    This boost in the rate gives Alcoa and Century windfall revenue gains as the Midwest physical premium responds to this.

    If we measure the windfall from Inauguration Day ($0.2385 per pound) to current nominal valuations of $0.385 on CME, the two producers are up about $0.1465 per pound.

    This revenue boost is doubly important to Century, which has the largest amount of idled smelter capacity (307,500 metric tons at Hawesville and Mt. Holly).

    It raises the question as to whether this revenue boost gives them sufficient confidence to pay more for power to restart one or both smelters.

    For Alcoa, it is more of an internal discussion, as their 54,000 tons of idled capacity at Warrick could be fed from onsite generating capacity that they own (Units 1-2-3) or partner with CenterPoint Energy (Unit 4 is 50/50 joint venture).

    How the windfall revenue impacts the ability to pay

    The International Aluminum Institute (IAI) tells us that North American smelters need 14,821 kilowatt hours (KWH) of electricity to make a metric ton of primary aluminum. That is 14.821 megawatt hours (MWH). We convert to MWH because power costs are denominated in MWH.

    If we take the current gain from the Midwest premium since Inauguration Day, we can determine how that would impact the ability to pay for power.

    The $0.1465 per pound appreciation in the Midwest premium = $322.98 per metric ton.

    This would translate into $21.79 per MWH of revenue gain.

    Now, let’s compare that to prevailing power prices on the CME MISO Indiana Hub power futures market. The MISO Indiana Hub is a good benchmark for where Century (or Alcoa) would l price forward delivery power contracts for purposes of re-powering Hawesville or Warrick.

    Delivery PeriodPrice in $ per MWH
    March 202546.26
    July 202574.40
    December 202559.70
    December 202667.95
    December 202771.50
    December 202876.00
    December 202979.10

    Most producers today would like to have power at $40 per MWH or less. So, the current MISO forward curve on power would not be attractive to Century or Alcoa.

    This is where the windfall revenue “could” come into play. The $21.79 per MWH gains from the Midwest “could” apply towards the forward power curve to buy down net cost as shown below:

    Delivery PeriodPrice in $ per MWHBuy DownNet Cost
    March 202546.26-21.7924.47
    July 202574.40-21.7952.61
    December 202559.70-21.7937.91
    December 202667.95-21.7951.83
    December 202771.50-21.7949.71
    December 202876.00-21.7948.08
    December 202979.10-21.7957.31

    This exercise would bring power below the target price of $40 in the spot market and in December 2025. However, this would be inadequate to justify the investment in restarting. This is always the trap when casual observers of the power market talk about power. There is a tendency to look at the spot market and assume it will roll forward. The above table demonstrates the problem…the forward market is in a contango or premium to spot. Restart decisions are going to be made when forward 2- or 3-year power prices align with their target. This allows them to amortize the restart costs over a longer period.

    Restart costs are high, up to $300 per metric ton. That covers things like pot relining, refurnishing electrical systems, finding skilled labor in this tight labor market, etc.

    These restart costs may also be where Alcoa and Century may elect to allocate the $300+ revenue gains, leaving them still on the hunt for competitive power.

    One reason for optimism is that the Midwest may not be done appreciating. As we have discussed in other AMU columns, the market has still not decided how to handicap the tariffs and price them. Some analysts still think we are headed to $.50 per pound over LME. That would provide additional leverage for power purchases.

    A handy rule of thumb is: Every $.01 per pound = $22.04 per ton = $1.49 per MWH in leverage.

    Waiting game continues

    U.S. producers are in the same boat as the rest of the market, waiting to see the outcome of this tariff situation to play out. Right now, they have some revenue gains to play with. The unknown is how much more will they accrue and will it be enough to allow them to buy forward power to justify restarts. Stay tuned.

    Latest in Distribution

    Century benefits from tariffs it backs, but volume growth hangs on Mt. Holly

    Century benefits from tariffs it backs, but volume growth hangs on Mt. Holly Century Aluminum’s Q1 2025 earnings show a company benefiting from aluminum’s pricing boom and Section 232 tariffs, while grappling with flat shipment volumes and lingering capacity constraints – especially at Mt. Holly. While strong Midwest premiums and LME prices point to near-term margin strength, Century’s full-year targes hinge on unlocking more tonnage. High prices, low throughput Century Aluminum reported Q1 2025 shipment volumes of 168,672 metric tons (t), down 3% from 174,627t the year prior. Deliveries from its’ Mt. Holly, South Carolina and Sebree, Kentucky facilities dropped similarly to 94,601t in the latest quarter. Despite the drop in shipments, Century pegged their US capacity utilization at 87.5% across two smelters – 75% at Mt. Holly and 100% at Sebree – equating to roughly 98,125t per quarter at current output. These figures are unchanged from from the prior year, predating the additional Section 232 tariffs that tacked an additional 25% on primary aluminum imports back in March. Can Mt. Holly shoulder the load? Century maintained full-year guidance of 700,000t, which would require a 5% increase over the Q1 run rate across the remaining three quarters. That equates to an additional 25,312t – nearly all of which must come from Mt. Holly. To hit that target, Mt. Holly would need to increase utilization to 86%, an 11-basis-point jump. However, it’s unclear whether Mt. Holly has achieved that level of output recently. Company presentations going back to 2018 don’t show it exceeding 75%, and power constraints have long plagued the site. While Century purchased the facility in 2014, its production has remained below nameplate capacity. Billet and slab output for 2025 remains unchanged – a combined 295,000t slated from both US facilities. Priced to impress Century anticipates the London Metal Exchange (LME) aluminum price to average $2,351/t in Q2 2025, based on a blend of 50% cash settlement and 50% of the three-month forward contract settlement. For that average to hold, the next 61 trading sessions would need to average around $2,560.13/t. That price point would imply an average cash settlement price of $2,531.14/t in Q2 and a 3M settlement average of $2,589.14/t over the same period, if the ~1.3¢/lb cash-to-3M spread throughout April and into May were to hold. For those keeping score at home. In other words, in terms of Midwest transaction price, Century’s guidance implies daily cash settlement trading to be around 8¢/lb higher than the $1.06-1.07/lb settlement on May 8th before adding in the delivery premium. Tangentially, Century also indicate expectations of a 39.28¢/lb average for the Midwest premium in the next quarter, fairly flat from recent levels. The company executives did note on the call that they expect the Midwest premium to reach 45-50¢/lb by the end of the year though, due to inventory reductions potentially boosting premiums. Tariffs boost margins, not metal Century enters Q2 riding strong pricing momentum and a tariff environment that works in its favor. With Section 232 duties now discouraging imports and tightening North American supply, the company is well-positioned to capitalized on elevated premiums. But the full benefits hinges on Mt. Holly. Unless the South Carolina smelter can meaningfully boost utilization, Century’s shipment guidance may be at odds with its physical output ceiling – leaving its growth story more about margins than metal.